Category Archives: Analysis

Transit Analysis

The Valentine neighborhood grew up around the development of the multiple street car routes that paralleled the neighborhood and flowed throughout the greater midtown district. Before Southwest Trafficway barreled through the western Midtown neighborhoods it was called Summit and possessed a streetcar that ran through the center of the street. On the other side of the Valentine neighborhood, Broadway Blvd had a mix of bus and streetcar routes over the years.

As time rolled on and paradigms shifted streetcars were removed, bus routes were cut, and streets were upgraded to handle higher capacities of car use. Today Southwest Trafficway acts as an interurban highway, moving cars to and from I-35 down to the Plaza eventually connecting to Ward Parkway. A bus route still exists on Broadway, though its route is much different than previous iterations. Valentine is also in proximity to the new Main St Streetcar route, only four blocks away.

Urbanist remiss the days of old when the Valentine neighborhood had an abundance of public transit access, but all hope is not lost. Both Broadway Blvd and Southwest Trafficway corridors are still ideal candidates for additional streetcar extensions to connect downtown with the southern neighborhoods, potentially rolling all the way down to 95th St. There is always the option of a more connected Valentine, but it will take most of the city to rebuild the once great Kansas City streetcar and larger public transit infrastructure.

Below is a public transit map of Kansas City’s streetcar, trolley and motor bus lines from 1944.

Existing Conditions Work

3D Model Title Map

I created a title slide featuring a 3D model of Valentine. I believe this made the groups work look a bit more professional. Unfortunately, we weren’t able to get a real, quality 3D model in time.

Housing Stock

While this graph did not make the final cut, it shows the advantage Valentine has of having a great deal of multi-unit housing stock.

Units in Structure Map

Map that shows the delineation of having a lot more single-unit structures, but more multi-units

Housing Stock Decline

Graph that shows housing stock decreasing, with the KCLIFE 71 Plan (started 1971) aftermath as a pivotal factor in this destruction

Demolition Coverage

Slide to display historic parallels to the Valentine Neighborhood Association’s response to KCLife through news articles in different time periods

Figure Ground GIF

While the original GIF file is lost, I continued the work of those who assembled the figure grounds by finishing the NE corner and turned it into a GIF.

Development Opportunities

Performance can be measured by reference to the spatial form of the city and the quality of spaces, recognizing that local context is often the primary influence on development and redevelopment. Previous developments and proposals can serve as a basis for what established place there originally.

An environment can be used to communicate the past and the present that form an extended pattern. Patterns in time are often celebrated, with holidays and the seasonal shifts, often influencing the uses of public and private spaces. The dimensions identified by Lynch are not too rigid or prescriptive to resist changing qualities of the environment. The consideration of a temporal factor in the identified dimensions of performance makes them consider needs of future development and anticipated challenges. 

The absolute of future development for the Valentine neighborhood is construction of more housing units, with diversity in housing stock comparable to what was available in the neighborhood’s past. Small apartments, ranging in 3 to 6 units, comprised the majority of units in structure in Valentine.

Elements of the Public Realm: Lighting

Lighting is necessary to visually experience and interpret our surroundings. Consideration must be given to the position of the sun to plan for lighting needs at all times of day.

Lighting elements should be contribute to a well-developed streetscape, even during daytime. Ornate lighting, like the above photo from Chesterfield, can establish a sense of place. An appearance resembling historic lighting poles and genuinely historic lighting helps pedestrians be immersed in the composite of the many elements of the public realm.

The Valentine neighborhood lacks historic lighting, with pole-mounted LED cobra lights being the most common lighting used for streets and sidewalks. These lights are directly over streets, leaving them better lit than adjacent sidewalks.

Existing Lighting in North Valentine, as depicted in the above map, is concentrated on the north side of blocks. This is likely due to the north side of structures in the Northern Hemisphere always being in shadow, requiring more light in lieu of sunlight.

The orientation of the remaining structures to face east or west provides ample natural lighting from the sun to the south, east, and west sides of the structure east.

As the sun’s position moves throughout the year, the north side of structures may be cast in longer shadows that stretch the span of the street. Ample lighting is needed on the north side of structures to establish a comfortable environment, comparable to the south facing side of the structure. The south facing side is appealing to pedestrians for the warmth, increased visibility, and intention is design given to south facing sides of a structure.

Existing Conditions + History of Transportation

The beginning of fixed route transit service to the Valentine neighborhood began October 1, 1889 as the Washing and Summit cable car line

• Provided access from West Bottoms to Downtown and the north side of the Valentine neighborhood

• Ran from Union Depot on Ninth to Washington. Washington to about 13th-14th Streets, continuing on13th-14th Summit Street. Summit Street to 29th Street

• Service was reduced to Southwest Boulevard in early 1901

Source: KC History https://kclibrary.org/art-objects/map-greater-kansas-city-suburbs

In 1920 the  Valentine neighborhood was served by the 21 Jackson-Roanoke streetcar route

• Service on the streetcar route from 1910’s

• Destination sign would read Jackson – 24th on Northbound trip

• Destination sign would read Roanoke – 45th or Summit – 39th on Southbound trip

• Streetcar service along Summit Street until widening and repaving of Summit Street in 1951

In 1944 the  Valentine neighborhood was served by the 57 Jackson-Roanoke streetcar route

• Service continued from 21 streetcar route from 1910’s

• Destination sign would read Jackson – 24th on Northbound trip

• Destination sign would read Roanoke – 45th or Summit – 39th on Southbound trip

• Streetcar service along Summit Street until widening and repaving of Summit Street in 1951

Source: KC History https://kchistory.org/image/broadway-boulevard-valentine-road-0

Streetcar service along Broadway Boulevard concluded in 1940’s

• Routes 4 and 48 provided service on Broadway Boulevard from 1920’s to 1940’s

• Route 4 ran from Ward Parkway and 59th Street to Belleview Avenue, winding on Westport Road and Broadway Boulevard to Downtown 

• Route 48 ran from Downtown along Broadway Boulevard to 39th Street, providing service east-west between State Line Road and Broadway

Broadway Boulevard is serviced by a single bus route, traveling from the Plaza to Armour

• Begins at the Plaza Transit Center, travelling up Broadway Boulevard and turning East onto ArmourBoulevard

• Runs on Armour Boulevard / 35th Street to Van Brunt, returning from Van Brunt Loop

• Connects St Luke’s Hospital to the Kansas City VA Medical Center along a dense residential corridor

• Route 35 has 435 daily riders in January 2026

Main MAX service was rerouted to Broadway Boulevard for nearly ten years 

• Provided 20-minute headways either direction from Waldo to River Market and Columbus Park

• Travelled along Grand Boulevard through Downtown, on Pershing Road, turning onto Penn Valley Drive / Broadway Boulevard

• Ran from 5AM to 12AM from Monday – Saturday

• Reduced service on Sundays

The Main Street Extension of the KC Streetcar replaced Main Max service 

• Operates at 10-12 minute frequencies

• Runs from 5 AM to 12 AM Monday-Thursday

• Runs from 5 AM to 1 AM Friday and Saturday

• Runs from 6AM to 12AM Sunday

• Connects River Market to South Plaza, UMKC

• Encourages Transit Oriented Development (TOD) on the Main Street Corridor

• 7,873 daily riders in January 2026

RideKC Route 31 provides East-West connectivity on the 31st Street Corridor at 15 minute frequencies

• 15 minute frequencies make it the most frequent bus route in the state of Missouri

• Not the most frequent bus corridor (Prospect Avenue)

• Runs from 5 AM to 12 AM Monday-Saturday

• Runs from 5 AM to 10 PM on Sunday

• Connects southern Independence to the core of Kansas City

• 1,931 daily riders in January 2026

Route 39 provides East-West transit on the 39th Street Corridor

• Operates at 30 minute frequencies

• Runs from 5 AM to 12 AM Monday-Saturday

• Runs from 5 AM to 10 PM on Sunday

• Connects KU Medical Center and Volker / Roanoke Neighborhoods to the East Side

• Deviation to VA Medical Center

• 584 daily riders in January 2026

Where access is provided, pedestrian and sidewalk infrastructure is well designed

• Southwest Trafficway has few points to cross the roadway

• Certain streets have unsafe crossings

• Road diets to Main Street and Broadway Boulevard have improved walking conditions along the respective corridors

• New tree plantings in the neighborhood will provide shade and clean air

• Short, small blocks improve walkability

Valentine Housing Units in Structure Comparison

I was assigned to analyze housing units in structure, by tenure, and by vacancy data for Valentine, Midtown, and Kansas City.

Due to inconsistency in the datasets, the following charts will show the percentage of single-family homes. The numbers are taken from the total units which also includes all multi-family units.

Legend

Graphs

Analysis

As seen on this data, Valentine & Old Hyde Park has seen less of a share of single-family units compared to both Midtown and Kansas City. However, while denser housing options are better for growth, the neighborhoods have also seen the loss of 1,676 units since 1940, Midtown lost 4,751 and Kansas City gained 108,670. Valentine & Old Hyde Park’s loss is the most alarming as those are just two neighborhoods out of Midtown’s eight.

Within the multi-family housing types, duplexes have historically been low compared to denser types as well as single-family homes in Valentine & Old Hyde Park and Midtown.

Inference

Based on this data, I think a good approach for Valentine is to continue building missing-middle housing. As of 2020, 5 to 9 (likely six and eight-plexes) and 10 to 19 (likely low-rises) unit structures are the most common housing types. Combined with the profusion of vacant land, as explored in the figure ground study, there is a feasible opportunity for Valentine to grow without disturbing its character and dramatically raising nearby rents and home values.

Valentine: Historic Figure Grounds

Introduction

For our second blog post, we are showing the history of Valentine buildings and streets in our assigned blocks from 1900 to today in 25-year intervals through figure ground maps. My assigned area is Pennsylvania Ave-Karnes Blvd and 32nd-34th St. Maps will be shown first, followed up by a data analysis, then 1940s Tax Assessment photos to see the kind of character the neighborhood has lost.

Maps

I thought the best way to illustrate this is through color-coding:

Map 1: 1900 Based on 1909 Sanborn Maps

Structures to be Demolished: 17

Map 2: 1925 Based on 1925 Atlus

Newly-Built Structures: 102

Map 3: 1950 Based on 1951 Sanborn Maps

Structures to be Demolished: 109

Newly-Built Structures: 8

Map 4: 1975 Based on 1975 Historic Aerial Photos

Structures to be Demolished: 10

Newly-Built Structures: 4 (Counting All College Buildings)

Map 5: 2000 Based on 2002 Historic Aerial Photos

Structures to be Demolished: 1

Newly-Modified Structure: 1

Map 6: 2025 Based on KC Parcel Viewer GIS Data

Newly-Modified Structure: 1

Data Analysis

The significant trend in this data presents a large number of structures built from 1900 to 1925, and an even larger number demolished from 1950 to 1975. From 2000 to 2025, the area has not seen as significant activity besides Metropolitan Community College – Penn Valley expansions.

It is also worth noting that all residential lots east of SW Trafficway are owned by Colonial Highlands, and the block Jefferson & 33rd is owned by KC Life Insurance, they also own the left half of Pennsylvania & 34th.

1940s Tax Assessment Photos

Access Tax Assessment Photos: https://kchistory.org/research/house-history/1940-tax-assessment-photographs

The foremost thing I noticed while looking at these photos is the significant loss of commercial activity, with some buildings closely resembling a sort of character that Brookside is known for:

1940s Tax Assessment Photo, Block 40

1940s Tax Assessment Photo, Block 52

What is also apparent is the dramatic loss of multi-family homes. This area had many colonnaded six-and-fourplexes, but none remain:

1940s Tax Assessment Photo, Block 40

1940s Tax Assessment Photo, Block 41

1940s Tax Assessment Photo, Block 40

The last thing I’ll note is the loss of some simplistic and tiny craftsman single-family homes, which are notably smaller and minimal than the shirtwaist homes lining the Coleman Highlands blocks:

1940s Tax Assessment Photo, Block 41

1940s Tax Assessment Photo, Block 52

North Loop Blog: Existing Conditions figure ground

Figure-ground study of the North Loop area circa 1930. Source: Sanborn-Perris Map Company, Ltd. (1896/1907, 1925); Tuttle-Ayers-Woodward Company (1925).
Figure-ground study of the North Loop area circa 1960. Source: Sanborn-Perris Map Company, Ltd. (1949, 1957, 1958).
Figure-ground study of the North Loop area circa 1990. Source: Sanborn-Perris Map Company, Ltd. (1958); U.S. Geological Survey (1991).
Figure-ground study of the North Loop area circa 2025. These are the existing conditions at the time of publication. Source: Kansas City, MO Parcel Viewer.

How do the Districts and Neighborhood s surrounding UMKC affect the development of Campus ? : Existing Conditions Analysis

By: Maryam Oyebamiji

The University of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC) is located in a diverse urban environment with a variety of neighborhoods and districts surrounding it. The development of campus is certainly influenced by the surrounding districts and neighborhoods, and vice versa.

One way in which the surrounding neighborhoods affect the development of campus is through their demographics and socioeconomic status. UMKC has a diverse student body, and the surrounding neighborhoods can provide opportunities for students to connect with different cultures and backgrounds. However, if the surrounding neighborhoods are economically disadvantaged, it may be more difficult to attract students and faculty to the area.

Additionally, the safety and security of the surrounding neighborhoods can have an impact on the development of campus. If the neighborhoods are perceived as unsafe, it may be more difficult to attract students and faculty to the area, and the university may need to invest in additional security measures.

On the other hand, the development of campus can also have an impact on the surrounding neighborhoods. UMKC has made efforts to partner with nearby neighborhoods to promote economic development, improve infrastructure, and enhance community engagement. The university has also played a role in revitalizing the surrounding area, such as through the creation of the UMKC Innovation Center and the redevelopment of the historic Brookside neighborhood.

In this Existing analysis project I made two district maps. One for Volker Campus and one for the Hospital Hill Campus.

Existing Conditions Analysis

My contribution to the analysis was transportation mostly focusing on the Hospital Hill Campus and the area directly south that connects to the Volker Campus.

The transportation team was responsible for representing traffic counts, directional turning traffic, pedestrian traffic, speed limits, and bus routes.

This map indicates the values of vehicles that are turning north, south, east, and west at major intersections from 19th St to Linwood Blvd. We found the majority of traffic is circling around the hospital hill campus because 31st St and Linwood Ave are carrying traffic from highway 71, and Main St is a connecting through Kansas City from Downtown to the Volker Campus. The main point of entries into Hospital Hill are south of 22nd St at Gillham Rd and Troost Ave.

This maps represents the average daily traffic, and the total number of vehicles that entered the intersection throughout a 12 hour period. The roads that mold hospital Hill, Troost Ave and Gillham Rd, show lower than predicted stressed streets. As shown above in the directional traffic map, 31st and Linwood are the most traffic traveled streets with a stress level of 10,000 to 19,999 cars per day.

Below is the map of connecting roads between Hospital Hill and Volker Campus. The level of stress on major roads such as Troost Ave and Main St changes as you pass Emanuel Cleaver Blvd. Another east and west street, MLK Blvd, is a high stress street that connects to highway 71 located east of campus. The stress level of these streets indicates that many students commute to campus via the highway system instead of intercity roads.

We also gathered the various speed limits around both campuses. I found that within Hospital Hill, the speed limit stays at 25 mph on Holmes St, Charlotte St, and Campbell St. The highest street that cuts through campus is 25th St where it rises to 30 mph. In addition, Grand Blvd is 25 mph because of Crown Center and it changes to 30 mph as you exit that area. All other roads in the surrounding area are 35 mph.

I produced sections and plan view of two different intersections of Troost Ave. The first intersection is at 27th and Troost which is directly in front of the Hospital Hill dorms, and the second is located at 51st and Troost on the bottom right corner of campus. We wanted to highlight the differences in infrastructure for pedestrians and cars. The first intersection has a median, a well defined painted area for pedestrians to cross, and on street parking to slow traffic down. The second intersection is a five lane street including a turn lane, and has a crosswalk indicated by only two white lines.