Skip to content

Fundraising for the UMKC Downtown Arts Campus Builds Momentum

Picture courtesty of the Kansas City Star

Picture courtesy of the Kansas City Star

The UMKC Foundation announced an additional $5.6 million in gifts to support the development of a Downtown Arts Campus for

UMKC’s Conservatory of Music and Dance.  The new gifts include the following:

  • $3 million from an anonymous donor for endowed scholarships
  • $1 million from the Sunderland Foundation
  • $500,000 from the Kirk Family
  • $400,000 from Burns & McDonnell
  • $250,000 from JE Dunn
  • $250,000 from Tom and Jean McDonnell
  • $100,000 from Greg and Deanna Graves
  • $100,000 from Charles and Mary Kay Horner

Including a matching $20 million grant from the Murial McBrien Kauffman Foundation, the private fundraising total for the Downtown Arts Campus has reached more than $30 million.  Private fundraising must reach $48 million before the Foundation is able to approach the state of Missouri for matching funds.  The entire project’s first phase is proposed to cost a total of $96 million.

The Downtown Arts Campus is set to cover a full city block located directly south of the Kauffman Center for the Performing ArtsKansas City’s Helix Architecture + Design Inc. and the Minneapolis-based HGA will design the conservatory.  The potential relocation of the Conservatory’s 600+ students will no doubt infuse the downtown arts scene with a sense of vibrancy, creativity, and enthusiasm.

Open Presentations for Honors College Dean Candidates

Interviews have been scheduled for each of the three Honors College Dean Candidates.  Faculty, staff, and students are invited to attend the open presentations as follows:


Monday, October 6, 2014chamberlain
10:45-11:45 AM, Student Union Room #301
Dr. Jeffrey Chamberlain

Curriculum Vitae




gustafsonWednesday, October 8, 2014

10:45-11:45 AM, Student Union Room #301

Dr. Kevin Gustafson

Curriculum Vitae



mckusick Thursday, October 9, 2014

10:45-11:45 AM, Student Union Room #301

Dr. James McKusick

Curriculum Vitae


Provost’s Comments on Budget and Salaries

I hope everyone by now has settled into the semester and it is going well.  I would love to be able to deliver an extremely positive message about our budget situation; I cannot, but I can honestly deliver a slightly positive message.  Some additional state funds are forthcoming but the revenues coming to us are largely restricted.  Still, this is better than previous years where our state budget has been flat or cut.  More about that below.

I do want to extend my profound thanks to all of our remarkable faculty and staff who continue to work so well with our students, delivering the highest quality education possible even under our challenging financial conditions.  I am committed to continuing to do all that I can to develop additional revenues and resources to support you in your work.

The following is the first in what I hope will be an ongoing dialogue about issues and concerns expressed by some of our faculty of late. I am going to try to communicate more often and, I hope, more effectively with faculty and staff via UMatters and our Academic Affairs’ blog; I am also trying to get around to visit Schools and departments to talk to faculty more frequently to respond to questions and concerns directly.  I cannot promise that I can answer every question in a manner that fully satisfies everyone, but I will do my best.  If you have questions that you would like to see addressed please submit them to and I will make every effort to respond in a timely manner!

Some Comments about the Budget and Salaries

Budget:  Our budget woes continue, and the major causes continue to be twofold.  First, the state disinvestment in public higher education has caused us to lose a significant piece of our funding.  For example, between fiscal year 2010 and fiscal year 2012 alone we lost $20M in state funding, the state part of our budget dropping from $95M to $75M as you can see from the graph below. Although our 2010 appropriation included a one-time infusion of $10 million in additional funds, we remain about $10 million per year below what had been the previous norm for state funding.

The other piece to the puzzle is that the decline in state funding is forcing us to evolve into a tuition-dependent institution — thus our emphasis on strategic enrollment increases.  As long as our enrollment was increasing modestly (about 3% overall per year), tuition dollars were replacing state funding and we could balance our budget without worrying unduly about cost-cutting.  However, for the past two years our enrollment growth has stalled, particularly our undergraduate enrollment, resulting in our budget dropping into the red, and our having to make substantial and painful cuts this past year.  The graph below shows our operating fund – state funding, tuition, and other sources of revenue – between FY 2008 and FY 2014.  Please also note that these charts are REVENUE charts – our costs have continued to rise apace.

 Operating Fund Revenues 1

So what about this academic year (AY2014-2015)?  The Governor only recently released the increase that the University of Missouri System was scheduled to receive as part of the state performance funding plan.  As stated above, however, the majority of new funding this year, per President Wolfe, is restricted and applies to our strategic plan – to support, for example, expansion of our e-learning efforts; need-based as well as merit-based scholarships; and start-up packages for new faculty.  If we receive additional resources over and above those assigned to the strategic plan I am hoping that we will yet be able to provide salary increases for faculty and staff.  I absolutely agree with those who lament that our faculty and staff salaries have fallen behind our peers.  A salary increase is by no means assured this year, but it is my top priority right now.  In the meantime, we are working hard to grow enrollment to provide additional resources, particularly to academic units.

Administrative Spending & Salaries:  There has been attention paid lately to administrative salaries and budget, prompted in part by a story that appeared this past Spring in the Chronicle of Higher Education.  Some faculty are concerned that our budget woes are being exacerbated by funds being diverted into administration, at the expense of faculty and staff salaries and academic programs.

If you have not seen it, the AAUP here at UMKC published data in the Spring purportedly showing just that trend, with the analyses based partly on data presented by the Chancellor in a PowerPoint about the budget ( The Faculty Advocate, April 2014).  I agree that we need to keep a close eye on administrative expenses and prioritize the academic mission – the heart of the University.  In fact, we have done that over the time I have been here.  Since 2008 we have absorbed three cuts to our state budget, and until last year we were able to protect the academic units from those cuts – we absorbed cuts in administration as long as we could.

The data, however, do not support some of the conclusions that are being drawn in the AAUP reports.  For example, when examining the “academic” versus “administrative” numbers there are a couple of things that must be considered in order to fairly evaluate the data.  First, the “administrative” employee category includes not only the higher level administrators people typically think of, but also employees at all salary levels, including tech support and other employees who directly support instruction, as well as a broad range of employees who people do not generally think of as “administrators”, for example, groundskeepers, maintenance workers, and administrative assistants.  Second, the data demonstrate that between FY 10 and FY 13 the percentage change in total spending for the academic category went up 9.2%, whereas total spending in the administrative category only increased 5%, even though we committed almost $600,000 to reclassify and raise the salaries of our very lowest paid staff members.  Finally, despite the constraints we have had in hiring, FTE academic employment increased by 4.5% while FTE administrative employment increased by only 0.4% from FY 2010 to FY 2013.

Here are the facts: Instruction at UMKC accounts for about 57% of the budget (going from 56.8% to 57% between AY 2003 and AY 20012) while Institutional Support (i.e., administrative costs) have risen from 8.1% to 8.9% of the budget in the same time period (see below).  Further, the amount allocated to Instruction in this graph does not include many employees involved in academic support, such as tutors and advisors.

I think it’s fair to say that we are not doing badly in terms of keeping administrative costs under control.

Percent Expenditure

A picture is being painted by some of dire academic decline. But again, here are the facts worth considering:

  • We still have a student-faculty ratio of 13 to 1.
  • 57 percent of our classes have fewer than 20 students, and only 10 percent of our classes have 50 or more students.
    • Those are very good numbers for a public research university. For example, at Kansas State, only 41 percent of classes have fewer than 20 students, and their student-faculty ratio is 19 to 1.

In future communications I will address other issues, for example, the strategic plan (University College, the Honors College, e-learning); academic hiring and the hiring of tenured and tenure-track faculty; the new General Education program; student retention – why we keep talking about it and why faculty should care; graduate education; and other topics that you identify as important to address.

-Provost Gail Hackett

Have a question for Provost Hackett? Send it to

Assessable Roo Newsletter, September 2014

Jennifer Friend, Interim Director for Assessment and Assistant Dean for the School of Graduate Studies, and Dan Stroud are pleased to present the 11th issue of The Assessable Roo.  This issue includes several noteworthy articles:

  • Susan Wilson, Vice Chancellor of the Division of Diversity and Inclusion, writes about the  benefits of adopting diversity-related learning outcomes to prepare students for a global society
  • Barbara Glesner-Fines, FaCET Assessment Mentor and Executive Associate Dean for Academics and Faculty at the School of Law, emphasizes the benefits of reflective practice for self-assessment and professional growth
  • The newly appointed Discourse Coordinator, Rhiannon Dickerson,  describes strengthening Discourse assessment via rubric development and evaluation
  • Jennifer Friend provides an overview of the video resources available for UMKC Assessment Coordinators and opportunities for open communication regarding assessments at upcoming FaCET sessions

The newsletter can be reviewed here.

Update on UMKC’s Response to the COACHE Survey (Workplace Satisfaction) Results

Dear Colleagues,

One of my overarching priorities is to foster a workplace that is valued by our faculty, students, and staff.  There is no doubting that the pressures of an academic career are significant – especially during periods of constraint such as those as we have experienced in recent times. Nonetheless it is important that we continuously strive to do more to support our community and, periodically, assess how we are performing and what further might be done at the department, division, or university-wide level.

Last fall, UMKC was one of many institutions to join the Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE), based at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, which administered a survey of job satisfaction. In this effort, locally coordinated by the UMKC COACHE team (Chris Brown, Lorie Holt, Georgia Smedley, Jenny Lundgren, Denis Medeiros, Larry Bunce, Jane Solose, Wayne Vaught, Peggy Ward Smith, Cindy Pemberton), surveys were sent to 399 tenured/tenure track faculty, and responses were received from 222 (56%).

Thank you to everyone who took the time to respond. Notably, the UMKC response rate was higher than our peer comparators and the full COACHE participant population.  I appreciate that time is a precious resource, and I am committed to making your contribution to this effort be worth every minute.

Survey responses are grouped into several themes, including the nature of the teaching, research, and service aspects of faculty work; the clarity and reasonableness of our tenure and promotion processes; satisfaction with personal and family supports; levels of climate and collegiality; and other aspects of your work-life.

COACHE has sent us a comprehensive report of the findings, including results at peer institutions and among a large cohort of similar institutions. The UMKC COACHE team is assisting me in interpreting and responding to the detailed findings. We will communicate the results and begin discussions about actions plans based on the survey findings this fall in a series of faculty senate, campus-wide faculty meetings, and unit specific meetings.  I encourage you to participate in these meetings so that you can learn the results of the survey and participate in developing consequent action plans.

  • September 2, 2014; 3:00 PM–Faculty Senate Presentation; Plaza Room Administrative Center
  • September 17, 2014; Noon–Volker Campus Faculty Meeting Presentation; Haag Hall, Room 301
  • October 15, 2014; Noon–Volker Campus Faculty Meeting Presentation; Haag Hall, Room 301
  • November 12, 2014; Noon–Health Sciences Campus Faculty Meeting Presentation; HSB, Room 4301

-Provost Gail Hackett

School of Medicine Professors Recognized as Influential Names in Science

Congratulations to UMKC School of Medicine professors Dr. John Spertus and Dr. David Cohen, who were featured in Thomson Reuters’ list of highly cited researchers, a compilation report of some of today’s most influential names in science.  Researchers earned this distinction by writing the greatest number of reports ranking in the top 1% most cited for their subject field and year of publication.  The researcher listings can be accessed at the Highly Cited Researchers Website.

Dr. John Spertus currently serves as the Daniel J. Lauer Missouri Endowed Chair in Metabolism and Vascular Disease Research and the Clinical Director of Outcomes Research at Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute.  Spertus’ research focuses on methods for measuring health care quality, assessing patients’ health outcomes, and the use of information technology to guide medical decision-making.

Dr. David Cohen is the Missouri Endowed Professor of Cardiovascular Health at the UMKC School of Medicine and Director of Cardiovascular Research at Saint Luke’s Mid America Health.  Cohen’s research addresses the application of cost-effective methods for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease as well as the inclusion of patient-centered outcomes in cardiovascular outcomes research.

2014 New Faculty Orientation

The 2014 New Faculty Orientation is scheduled for Friday, August 22, 2014 from 7:45 A.M. – 4:00 P.M.  It will be located in the Plaza Room of the 2nd Floor Administrative Center.  Please complete and submit the registration form by August 11th so that we may have an accurate count of attendees! This year’s agenda can be located here.  For further information regarding the orientation, or an overview of UMKC and Kansas City resources, please visit our New Faculty Resources Blog.

Registration Open for August 22 FaCET Symposium

Registration is now open for the Fall 2014 FaCET Symposium! This semester’s conference is entitled “Stellar Student Support: Enhancing Learning through Supplemental Instruction, General Education, and Online Education.” The conference will be held on August 22nd, from 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM at the Kauffman Conference Center.  Lunch will be provided for those who register by noon on Friday, August 15th.  Please be sure to email Peggy Ward-Smith with any dietary restrictions.

The official program can be located here, and will include a keynote address by Saundra McGuire, Director of the Center for Academic Success at Louisiana State University, as well as afternoon breakout sessions regarding online writing and supplemental instruction, anchor/discourse courses, RooWriter, and much more.  For additional information, please visit the official FaCET blog.

June 2014 Issue of Assessable Roo

I am pleased to present the tenth issue of the Assessable Roo, which has several wonderful articles that I hope that you will review:

  • Diane Hunter writes about her team’s successes in assessing information literacy in the Discourse classes
  • Kathy Hale describes the assessment of an excellent student affairs program that helped students “find their passion”
  • Jennifer Friend highlights the findings and action plans from a well-designed survey and focus groups on improving graduate students’ writing
  • Dan Stroud explains how the library is “hearing the students’ voice” and responding to their feedback
  • I provide an overview of resources that are available for you about assessment

As we complete this last newsletter, I want to thank Dan Stroud for his outstanding work on all 10 of these newsletters.  His creativity and terrific design skills have been the driving force behind these publications.

The newsletter can be found here.

-Nathan K. Lindsay, Ph.D., Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment

A Smoke-Free UMKC

On August 1, 2014, smoking and the use of tobacco will be prohibited on UMKC’s Volker and Hospital Hill campuses.  The change in policy is the result of a student-led initiative that indicated that the majority of employees and students at UMKC value a smoke- and tobacco-free environment.  In addition, a smoke- and tobacco-free UMKC falls in line with the university’s overall vision to provide a safe and healthy environment for all students, faculty, and other individuals associated with the campus.

“Smoking”, as defined by the new policy, includes but is not limited to, tobacco, cloves, all cigarette products (cigarettes, bidis, kreteks, e-cigarettes, etc.) and all smoke-producing devices (cigars, pipes, hookahs, etc.). The smoke-free policy will apply to:

  • All outdoor common and educational areas; inside all university owned or leased buildings
  • Campus sidewalks and parking lots
  • Recreational areas
  • Outdoor stadiums
  • University-owned and leased vehicles

Tobacco use will be allowed in personal vehicles, with the windows completely closed, located in designated parking areas on the two UMKC campuses. The smoking ban does not extend to public settings/streets governed by the City of Kansas City.

For more information about the policy change or on how to potentially quit smoking, visit the smoke-free UMKC website.